N/A
Overall health index cannot be calculated due to missing component data.
Note: One or more underlying data components are missing, preventing calculation of some health factors and the overall index.
Measures stability vs. a dynamic baseline and an ideal balance. (0=max deviation, 100=perfect stability)
Composite of deck and card pool diversity (0 = min. diversity, 100 = max. diversity).
Measures the trend in event participation. High scores reflect stability or growth, while low scores indicate a decline.
Measures the trend in player engagement. High scores reflect stability or growth, while low scores indicate a decline.
How strongly few decks dominate (0 = max. dominance, 100 = max. diversity of top decks). N/A if data is insufficient.
Economic health based on card demand and affordability. This is a 50/50 simple average of the two sub-factors.
AI-based sentiment score of the latest B&R announcement's impact on format health.
| Super-Archetype | 5-Year Avg. | 90-day Baseline | Current | Deviation (5y/90d) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AGGRO | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0%/0.0% |
| CONTROL | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0%/0.0% |
| COMBO | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0%/0.0% |
N/A
This score is a weighted average reflecting metagame stability. It combines similarity to the dynamic baseline (40% weight), the historical 5-year average (40% weight), and a theoretically balanced metagame (20% weight).
100.0 / 100
Measures how similar the current archetype balance is to the stable 5-year average.
100.0 / 100
Measures how similar the current archetype balance is to the dynamic 90d baseline.
0.0 / 100
Measures how similar the current balance is to a conceptual one-third split between archetypes.
Diversity data is not available.
No chart data available for monthly event counts.
25.1 / 100
Average Monthly Growth Rate: -8.5%.Event Counts changed from 41 (Jun 2025) to 24 (Dec 2025), a -41.5% shift over 6 months.
Not enough data to display player volume chart.
71.3 / 100
This is the final score contributing to the overall Health Index. It's an average of the available platform scores below.
97.4 / 100
Average Monthly Growth: 12.2%.Player counts changed from 210 (Jun 2025) to 420 (Dec 2025), a +100.0% shift over 6 months.
45.1 / 100
Average Monthly Growth: -4.4%.Player counts changed from 705 (Jun 2025) to 537 (Dec 2025), a -23.8% shift over 6 months.
| Rank | Deck Name | Months at #1 |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Esper Lurrus | 7 |
| 2 | Paradoxical Outcome | 2 |
| 3 | Bazaar Aggro | 1 |
| Rank | Deck Name | Months at #1 |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Paradoxical Outcome | 4 |
| 2 | Dimir Control | 2 |
| 3 | Coveted Jewel | 1 |
71.5 / 100
This is the final score contributing to the overall Health Index. It's an average of the available platform scores below.
61.1 / 100
Most dominant deck (last 12 mo): Esper Lurrus (7 mo. at #1).
81.9 / 100
Most dominant deck (last 12 mo): Paradoxical Outcome (4 mo. at #1).
Not enough data to display price trend chart.
N/A
This is the final score. It's an average of the demand and affordability scores below.
1.8 / 100
Measures price basket trends. Stability or growth is healthy; decline is heavily penalized.
N/A / 100
Benchmarks format price against the most affordable MtG formats.
No card status changes were announced for this format.
The Vintage format is currently assessed as exceptionally healthy and diverse, featuring seven or eight successful archetypes in recent major events, including Initiative, Dredge, and various Shops and Lurrus strategies. The lack of changes indicates strong confidence that the format's current stability and competitive variety will be maintained.
90.0 / 100
This score reflects the AI's sentiment on the future health of the format based on the announcement. 1 = Very Negative, 50 = Neutral, 100 = Very Positive.